Obama goes on the offensive.
Posted on 21. Jan, 2010 by scott in economic daydreaming, political munglings
With the loss of his super-majority in the senate, President Obama has decided to act quickly and decisively — setting the stage for a moderate stance that could work in the months to come.
He announced today a number of initiatives to limit the ‘free-market’ activities of big banks. The implications to future profitability for those institutions (think here of JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and such) is going to be significant.
Apparently investors think things are going to get a bit darker for the ‘biggies’ as a result. Stocks of most of them took a big hit today.
thanks to adobemac for the flickr foto
Summarizing Obama’s speech is easy. He doesn’t want the big banks to be able to take risky bets on other people’s money. Heck, what precipitated the recent recession if not the big banks (financial institutions) and their Las Vegas style of money management? The President gets it.
At first I was a bit disappointed. You know, here goes the democrats putting new regulations and restrictions on free enterprise. But on further reflection I am inclined to take a Keynesian mock-liberal view. Do what is best for the country.
In fact I believe the President’s action will go a long way toward limiting future financial crises.
You see, what happened in the past few years is that financial institutions had every incentive to take the ‘big’ bets. Low interest rates made money readily available. The banks ability to leverage ‘our’ money made it even easier and potentially more profitability. There seemed little or no risk to taking big bets.
Lack of regulations in that wild-west landscape?
Even Greenspan admitted that financial executives were legally (morally?) able to operate for their best good at the expense of ‘us.’
Bottom line: I approve of the President’s anger and response.
Financial institutions should be free to do whatever they want with their own equity (money they have put up). But, as regards to all of ‘our’ depository money (which gave them huge additional leverage)?
Whoa cowboy, keep that money safe and even off the freaking radar of the overpaid money managers who just loved to bet ‘our’ money so they could get any spoils but not risk any of their own $$. $20 million bonuses? Easy money folks. But not so much now.
Good work, Mr. President! Keep thinking outside of the box . . . you may even be able to persuade a republican or two to consider legitimate health care reform.



This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.