Obama finally gets it right.  Really.

Obama finally gets it right. Really.

Posted on 02. Mar, 2010 by scott in economic daydreaming

As I listened today to President Obama’s speech at Savannah Tech I became more and more enthusiastic.  The new Home star program that he explained there appears to be a real ’swing for the fence’ home run.

I like it.  The home construction industry will like it.  Home Depot and Lowes (mentioned in the speech) are really going to like it.  Local building supply retailers are going to like it.  Most importantly the American home owner is going to like it–a lot I suspect.

Here are some of the items he spoke about:

Homeowners are going to be given an incentive to make their most important possession (usually) more energy efficient with a ‘rebate’ of up to $3,000.  The rebate will be calculated by giving back 50% of the cost of applicable ‘raw materials’ needed to accomplish the goal.  The program is tilted towards things like windows, doors, insulation, roofing and such.

All of that is good enough, but Obama has shown his true potential here with the  way he is going to handle the details.  And, in this case the approach is unique, vary creative and a major step in simplifying the process.

Let me say here that I used the old program last year to get a $1300 tax credit for buying new highly insulated windows . . . but I had to search carefully for the right ones, get all kinds of details on efficiency, keep records of the entire project, calculate only the actual window costs and then apply those to my taxes to get the credit some 8 months after the project started.  Yechh!

But this new program is a giant leap forward in government thinking and execution.  It helps the consumer, it helps the construction industry, small business, local contractors (all hurting in this recession) and big box and local home suppliers alike.

The rebate applies to things like roofing, insulation, windows and doors–all things that are usually made in the good ‘ol USA — oh yeah, baby.  Those things are all going to be installed by local contractors and sold by local stores.  The program is actually going to create jobs, save consumers $ over the long term and short term, and stimulate the economy (get us consumers to spend).

But, the greatest and most unique part of the program (and don’t ask me how the government is going to do this ) is that you and I, if we chose to improve our home’s efficiency will get the ‘rebate’ right at the cash register.  No waiting.

Now, that is thinking Mr. President.   You’ve made this program appealing and easy.  That doesn’t sound like something government would typically create.

So I congratulate you President Obama.  You are finally showing that you have the capacity to live up to your ‘hype’ and push change that is beneficial all the way around.  I just wish that this kind of focus had been forthcoming earlier in the recession.  Think of what the $758 billion stimulus could have accomplished if this kind of program had been used and multiplied by 10 fold.

Fantastic.  Private sector type thinking goes a long way to making me, and a few hundred million others, believe we just might be able to improve our trust in government and stimulate our confidence . . . 70% of the U.S. economy just got a little more positive in their outlook.

Great job Mr. President.  Hoorah!

Tags: , , , , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

3 Responses to “Obama finally gets it right. Really.”

  1. Nic Lovelace

    05. Mar, 2010

    Where is the government getting the cash to continue on with all of these credits which have been offered let it be the infamous ‘new home buyer tax credit’ or now this new ‘energy efficient’ rebate? These “incentives” seem to affect only a small number of American’s. Why not cut capital gains tax for small business, slash unnecessary regulations, reduce taxes for those who return to school, and to those who provide jobs? This would effect a greater amount of American’s, and allow those that don’t have a home or the means to purchase a home to change their economic situation by either returning to school, starting a business, hiring, and given incentive for [producing capital gains. TAX BREAKS, TAX BREAKS, TAX BREAKS to those who contribute to producing real growth in the economy.

    Reply to this comment
    • scott

      05. Mar, 2010

      All of your suggestions are good — except they should have been implemented by the government a year or two ago. Each of them takes a good long time to show any impact on the economy, unemployment, exports and inflation. The problem is that to alter the delicate balance with such changes right now is too dangerous because the economy is attempting to balance itself using the existing stimulus packages.
      This means that if your changes were implemented now then the impact on the economy 12-24 months down the road would create further stimulation that just might cause enormous growth and raise the specter of super-inflation and then we would face yet another recession.
      So, caution is the word right now. Sadly we have to wait and see how the existing stimulus efforts will impact the economy before adding new programs for growth.

      Reply to this comment
  2. Joseph De Luca

    11. Mar, 2010

    If this program creates jobs why didn’t we think of this before?! Too much time has passed to overlook alternatives for unemployment. The government needs to continue with these ideas for job creation and economic growth. The rebate would force consumers to spend because why would they save when the rate is 0%? If this program doesn’t work, then the government will go back to the drawing board for another “team” play. I do agree with Nic that these incentives do affect only a small group, but is a small increase in GDP better than none at all? If so, then at what and whose expense?

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply